Skip to content

Johnston v. Florida

Petition for certiorari denied on November 13, 2018

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-5793 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2018

Issue: (1) Whether the Florida Supreme Court"s holding that a Hurst error is per se harmless when a jury issues a generalized unanimous recommendation for death, after receiving instructions that the judge would make both the findings of fact necessary for a death sentence and render the final decision on the death penalty, contravenes the Eighth Amendment under Caldwell v. Mississippi; and (2) whether the refusal of the Florida courts to consider the proffered scientific and sociological evidence to refute the notion of harmless Hurst error in this case resulted in violations of due process under the Fifth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/24/2018Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)
09/27/2018Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
10/11/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
10/12/2018Reply of petitioner Ray Johnston filed. (Distributed)
10/22/2018Rescheduled.
10/29/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
11/05/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
11/13/2018Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
12/06/2018Petition for Rehearing filed.
12/12/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
01/07/2019Rehearing DENIED.