Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Johnson v. Alaska

Petition for certiorari denied on June 15, 2020
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1065 Alaska Ct. App. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issues: (1) Whether the confrontation clause prohibits the prosecution from introducing into evidence at trial a certified lab report reflecting statements of nontestifying analysts through a surrogate expert who, although a supervisor at the lab, merely reviewed the report and results and did not conduct or observe any of the underlying tests; and (2) whether the confrontation clause prohibits the surrogate expert from testifying at trial about the underlying tests, including the particular samples tested, procedures followed and results reached.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 24 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
Mar 27 2020Waiver of right of respondent State of Alaska to respond filed.
Apr 01 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
Apr 07 2020Response Requested. (Due May 7, 2020)
May 07 2020Brief of respondent State of Alaska in opposition filed.
May 26 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
May 26 2020Reply of petitioner Teresa Ann Johnson filed. (Distributed)
Jun 15 2020Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards