Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-58 | F.I.S.C. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2013 |
Issue: (1) Whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court exceeded its narrow statutory authority to authorize foreign intelligence surveillance, under 50 U.S.C. § 1861, when it ordered Verizon to disclose records to the National Security Agency for all telephone communications “wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls;” and (2) whether petitioner is entitled to relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) to vacate the order of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 8 2013 | Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due August 12, 2013) |
Aug 8 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2013. |
Aug 9 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Information Privacy and Surveillance Law filed. |
Aug 12 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Professors James E. Pfander, and Stephen I. Vladeck filed. |
Aug 12 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Former Members of the Church Committee, and Law Professors filed. |
Aug 12 2013 | Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. |
Aug 30 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 11, 2013. |
Oct 7 2013 | Letter of October 7, 2013, from counsel for petitioner received. |
Oct 11 2013 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Oct 28 2013 | Reply of petitioner filed. |
Oct 30 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 15, 2013. |
Nov 18 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
www.scotusblog.com
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.