|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-818||2d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether an individual can “submit” to an assertion of police authority—and thus become seized within the meaning of the Supreme Court's fourth amendment precedents—by complying temporarily before fleeing.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 05 2017||Application (17A378) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2017 to December 7, 2017, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.|
|Oct 06 2017||Application (17A378) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 7, 2017.|
|Dec 06 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2018)|
|Jan 03 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2018 to February 7, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2018.|
|Jan 11 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 7, 2018 to March 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 9, 2018.|
|Feb 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2018 to April 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 01 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 9, 2018.|
|Apr 09 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Apr 23 2018||Reply of petitioner Branden Huertas filed.|
|Apr 24 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.|
|May 14 2018||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...