|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-123||9th Cir.||Mar 20, 2013||Jun 10, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: A farmer who is deemed to have violated an agricultural marketing order, is fined, has a fine assessed against him, and seeks to argue that the fine is an unconstitutional “taking” can bring his “takings” claim in a regular federal district court without first paying the fine; he is not required to bring that claim in the Court of Federal Claims.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 10, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 4 2012||Administrative record from U.S. Dept. of Justice is electronic.|
|May 29 2012||Application (11A1125) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2012 to August 9, 2012, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jun 1 2012||Application (11A1125) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until July 25, 2012.|
|Jul 25 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2012)|
|Aug 21 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 26, 2012.|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 26, 2012.|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief of respondent Department of Agriculture in opposition filed.|
|Nov 5 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.|
|Nov 5 2012||Reply of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 21 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 9, 2013.|
|Dec 21 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 12, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 20, 2013|
|Jan 9 2013||Brief of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed.|
|Jan 9 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received)|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed.|
|Jan 18 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Jan 18 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern Districtof California (Fresno) is electronic.|
|Jan 23 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Feb 4 2013||Administrative record from U.S. Dept. of Justice is electronic.|
|Feb 12 2013||Brief of respondent Department of Agriculture filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Sun-Maid Growers of California filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 13 2013||Reply of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 20 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Michael W. McConnell, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 10 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 12 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
No real opinions today. The Supreme Court dismissed cert as "improvidently granted" in Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.—a case about arbitration agreements.
That's all for today, folks.
The Supreme Court does not add any cases to its docket. It sends the Trump emoluments case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Here is the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012521zor_3f14.pdf