|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-683||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2015|
Issue: (1) Whether this Court intended in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke to allow the Department to deprive all third-party home care employers (who employ more than 90% of all home care employees) of their statutory right to avail themselves of exemptions to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act; (2) whether the D.C. Circuit erred in finding that Congress intended to exclude employees of third party employers from the home care exemptions, thereby conflicting with Coke’s contrary reading of Congressional intent and creating a conflict in the circuits; and (3) whether the Department’s new rule should be found to be unreasonable due to the agency’s failure to meaningfully address the relevant factors of unaffordability and lack of adequate state funding of the increased costs of home health care under the new rule.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 24 2015||Application (15A326) for a stay of mandate pending the timely disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Oct 6 2015||Application (15A326) denied by The Chief Justice.|
|Nov 18 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2015)|
|Dec 16 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 25, 2016.|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Kansas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 24 2015||Brief amici curiae of ADAPT and The National Council on Independent Living filed.|
|Jan 22 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 24, 2016.|
|Feb 24 2016||Brief of respondents David Weil, in his Official Capacity as Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 7 2016||Reply of petitioners Home Care Association of America, et al. filed.|
|Mar 9 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 25, 2016.|
|Mar 24 2016||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 28 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 1, 2016.|
|Jun 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||Petition DENIED.|
We’ve gotten roughly half of the merits opinions for the term so far. Kavanaugh is trending as the median justice and appears to be supplanting Roberts.
Of course, that could all change by June. Here’s the first in a series on interim stats from the term.
On a new, conservative court, Kavanaugh sits at the center - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first in a series on interim statistics from the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. The Supreme Cou...
The Supreme Court will release orders and opinion(s?) on Monday May 17.
Order list at 9:30 a.m. EDT. Opinions at 10:00.
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.