|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-729||2d Cir.||Oct 15, 2013||Dec 16, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2013|
Holding: Absent a controlling statute to the contrary, a participant in an employee benefit plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the plan may agree by contract to a particular limitations period, even one that starts to run before the cause of action accrues, as long as the period is reasonable.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on December 16, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 11 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2013)|
|Dec 11 2012||Appendix of Julie Heimeshoff filed.|
|Jan 30 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.|
|Feb 7 2013||Response Requested . (Due March 11, 2013)|
|Mar 11 2013||Brief of respondents Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 26 2013||Reply of petitioner Julie Heimeshoff filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 27 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013.|
|Apr 15 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Apr 30 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 25, 2013.|
|Apr 30 2013||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2013.|
|Jun 18 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 19 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., and Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated.|
|Jun 25 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jun 25 2013||Brief of petitioner Julie Heimeshoff filed.|
|Jul 2 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jul 2 2013||Brief amici curiae of AARP and National Employment Lawyers Association filed.|
|Jul 2 2013||Brief amicus curiae of United Policyholders filed.|
|Jul 22 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 15, 2013.|
|Aug 20 2013||Brief of respondents Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 27 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 27 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Council of Life Insurers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 27 2013||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 5 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 2nd Circuit is electronic (Not PACER).|
|Sep 5 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for District of Connecticut is eletronic and is located on PACER.|
|Sep 19 2013||Reply of petitioner Julie Heimeshoff filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 1 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 15 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Matthew W.H. Wessler, Washington, D. C.; and Ginger D. Anders, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Catherine M.A. Carroll, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 16 2013||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 17 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf