Hamilton v. Lanning
Disclosure: Akin Gump represented the respondent in this case.
Holding: The Court held that a debtor œprojected income refers to future calculations based on actual income rather than those based on past income over a period of years.
Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito on June 7, 2010. Justice Scalia dissented.
Briefs and Documents