|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-658||7th Cir.||Oct 10, 2017||Nov 8, 2017||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2017|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit erred in treating as jurisdictional Rule 4(a)(5)(C)’s limitation on extensions of time to file a notice of appeal.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on November 8, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 15 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2016)|
|Dec 14 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 18, 2017, for all respondents.|
|Jan 18 2017||Brief of respondents Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago & Fannie Mae in opposition filed.|
|Jan 30 2017||Reply of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed.|
|Feb 01 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017.|
|Feb 21 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017.|
|Feb 27 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 02 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Mar 08 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 15, 2017.|
|Mar 21 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charmaine Hamer.|
|Apr 03 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Apr 11 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Fannie Mae.|
|Apr 19 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party , received from counsel for respondent Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago.|
|May 15 2017||Brief of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed.|
|May 17 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Scott Dodson in support of neither party filed.|
|May 19 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The American Academy of Appellate Lawyers filed.|
|Jun 08 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 31, 2017.|
|Jul 19 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 10, 2017.|
|Jul 31 2017||Brief of respondents Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al. filed.|
|Aug 01 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.|
|Aug 09 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 29 2017||Reply of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 10 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Jonathan A. Herstoff, New York, N. Y. For respondents: Damien G. Stewart, Washington, D. C.|
|Nov 08 2017||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Dec 11 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.