|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-658||7th Cir.||Oct 10, 2017||Nov 8, 2017||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2017|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit erred in treating as jurisdictional Rule 4(a)(5)(C)’s limitation on extensions of time to file a notice of appeal.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on November 8, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 15 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2016)|
|Dec 14 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 18, 2017, for all respondents.|
|Jan 18 2017||Brief of respondents Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago & Fannie Mae in opposition filed.|
|Jan 30 2017||Reply of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed.|
|Feb 01 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017.|
|Feb 21 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017.|
|Feb 27 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 02 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Mar 08 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 15, 2017.|
|Mar 21 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charmaine Hamer.|
|Apr 03 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Apr 11 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Fannie Mae.|
|Apr 19 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party , received from counsel for respondent Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago.|
|May 15 2017||Brief of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed.|
|May 17 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Scott Dodson in support of neither party filed.|
|May 19 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The American Academy of Appellate Lawyers filed.|
|Jun 08 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 31, 2017.|
|Jul 19 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 10, 2017.|
|Jul 31 2017||Brief of respondents Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al. filed.|
|Aug 01 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.|
|Aug 09 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 29 2017||Reply of petitioner Charmaine Hamer filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 10 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Jonathan A. Herstoff, New York, N. Y. For respondents: Damien G. Stewart, Washington, D. C.|
|Nov 08 2017||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Dec 11 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.