|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-613||10th Cir.||Nov 30, 2015||May 23, 2016||7-1||Sotomayor||OT 2015|
Holding: (1) Because part of the "matter alleged to be discriminatory" in a constructive-discharge claim alleging discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an employee's resignation, the forty-five-day limitations period for contacting an Equal Employment Opportunity counselor for such action (a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit alleging discrimination) begins running only after an employee resigns; and (2) a constructive-discharge claim accrues -- and the limitations period begins to run -- when the employee gives notice of his resignation, not on the effective date thereof.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on May 23, 2016. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 2 2014||Application (14A368) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 26, 2014 to November 26, 2014, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Oct 6 2014||Application (14A368) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 26, 2014.|
|Nov 25 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 29, 2014)|
|Dec 23 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 28, 2015.|
|Jan 26 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 27, 2015.|
|Feb 19 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 16, 2015.|
|Mar 11 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 18, 2015.|
|Mar 18 2015||Brief of respondent Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General in opposition filed.|
|Mar 31 2015||Reply of petitioner Marvin Green filed.|
|Apr 1 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 17, 2015.|
|Apr 20 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.|
|Apr 27 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 15 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 6, 2015.|
|May 15 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2015.|
|Jun 30 2015||Letter from the Solicitor General informing Clerk of their position on the merits.|
|Jul 6 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received).|
|Jul 6 2015||Brief of petitioner Marvin Green filed.|
|Jul 13 2015||Brief amici curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., and National Women's Law Center filed.|
|Jul 13 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The National Employment Lawyers Association filed.|
|Jul 28 2015||Catherine M.A. Carroll, Esq., of Washington, D. C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below. Briefs of other amici curiae in support of the judgment below are to be filed within 7 days of the filing of the brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae.|
|Jul 28 2015||Brief of respondent Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General in support of affirmance filed.|
|Aug 3 2015||The time to file the brief of the Court-appointed amicus curiae is extended to and including September 28, 2015.|
|Sep 28 2015||Brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below filed.|
|Oct 2 2015||Motion for allocation of argument time filed by respondent Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General (on behalf of the parties and Court-appointed amicus curiae).|
|Oct 5 2015||Brief amici curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council, et al. filed.|
|Oct 5 2015||Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.|
|Oct 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 30, 2015|
|Oct 19 2015||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit|
|Oct 19 2015||Record from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of 1 Box.|
|Oct 27 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 28 2015||Reply of petitioner Marvin Green filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2015||Reply of respondent Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General in support of affirmance filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2015||Motion for allocation of argument time GRANTED.|
|Nov 30 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Brian Wolfman, Stanford, Cal. For respondent: Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Catherine M.A. Carroll, Washington, D. C.|
|May 23 2016||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jun 24 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...