|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-857||Ohio Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the due process and equal protection clauses prohibit states from imposing substantial financial burdens on indigent parties seeking judicial review (as at least six states have held), or whether states effectively deprive low-income litigants of access to the judicial system (as at least five states have held)—even when the court access in question represents the party’s first opportunity to obtain meaningful judicial review of an involuntary property taking.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 23 2019||Application (19A456) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Oct 28 2019||Application (19A456) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 3, 2020.|
|Jan 03 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)|
|Jan 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 10, 2020 to March 11, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 15 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2020.|
|Mar 11 2020||Brief of respondent Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District in opposition filed.|
|Mar 25 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Mar 25 2020||Reply of petitioner GPI Distributors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 20 2020||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.