Skip to content

Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-1274 2d Cir. Jan 8, 2013 Feb 27, 2013 9-0 Roberts OT 2012

Holding: The five-year statute of limitations for the SEC to bring a civil suit seeking penalties for securities fraud against investment advisers begins to tick when the fraud occurs, not when it is discovered.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 27, 2013.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/06/2012Application (11A755) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 20, 2012 to March 22, 2012, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
02/10/2012Application (11A755) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until March 22, 2012.
03/02/2012Application (11A755) to extend further the time from March 22, 2012 to April 20, 2012, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
03/07/2012Application (11A755) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until April 20, 2012.
04/20/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2012)
05/15/2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 25, 2012.
06/14/2012Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 25, 2012.
07/25/2012Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition filed.
08/08/2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.
08/14/2012Reply of petitioners Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed. (Distributed)
09/10/2012Supplemental brief of petitioner Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed. (Distributed)
09/21/2012Supplemental brief of petitioner Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed. (Distributed) (Second Supplemental)
09/25/2012Petition GRANTED.
10/31/2012SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 8, 2013.
11/02/2012Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in suport of either party or of neither party, received from the Solicitor General on behalf of the respondent.
11/05/2012Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
11/09/2012Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
11/09/2012Brief of petitioners Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed.
11/13/2012Record from the U.S.D.C. for the Southern District of New York is electronic.
11/16/2012CIRCULATED.
11/16/2012Brief amicus curiae of Association of the Bar of the City of New York filed. (Distributed)
11/16/2012Brief amicus curiae of American Bankers Association filed. (Distributed)
11/16/2012Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/16/2012Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
11/16/2012Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)
11/16/2012Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2012Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Former SEC Commissioners and Officials.
12/03/2012Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Former SEC Commissioners and Officials GRANTED.
12/04/2012Record from U.S.C.A. for 2nd Circuit is electronic.
12/07/2012Brief amicus curiae of Occupy the SEC filed. (Distributed)
12/10/2012Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission filed. (Distributed)
12/26/2012Reply brief of petitioners Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed. (Distributed)
01/07/2013Letter from counsel for petitioners Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert filed. (Distributed)
01/08/2013Argued. For petitioners: Lewis J. Liman, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Jeffrey B. Wall, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
02/27/2013Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
04/01/2013JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Holding: The five-year statute of limitations for the SEC to bring a civil suit seeking penalties for securities fraud against investment advisers begins to tick when the fraud occurs, not when it is discovered.

 

Judgment:”Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 27, 2013.