|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-10882||Fla.||Mar 3, 2014||May 27, 2014||5-4||Kennedy||OT 2013|
Holding: Florida's threshold requirement, as interpreted by the Florida Supreme Court, that defendants show an IQ test score of 70 or below before being permitted to submit additional intellectual disability evidence is unconstitutional because it creates an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disabilities will be executed.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on May 27, 2014. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 6 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2013)|
|Jul 18 2013||Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.|
|Aug 1 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013.|
|Oct 15 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 18, 2013.|
|Oct 21 2013||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Nov 21 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 16, 2013.|
|Nov 21 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 27, 2014.|
|Nov 25 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 3, 2014|
|Dec 16 2013||Joint appendix filed (2 volumes.) (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Dec 16 2013||Brief of petitioner Freddie Lee Hall filed.|
|Dec 19 2013||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Adam Lamparello and Charles MacLean in support of neither party.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Psychological Association, et al. filed.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Former Judges, and Law Enforcement Officials filed.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, et al. filed.|
|Jan 8 2014||Record received from the Supreme Court of Florida. (1 Box)|
|Jan 9 2014||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 13 2014||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Adam Lamparello and Charles MacLean in support of neither party GRANTED.|
|Jan 27 2014||Brief of respondent Florida filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 3 2014||Brief amici curiae of States of Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 3 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 24 2014||Reply of petitioner Freddie Lee Hall filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 3 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Allen Winsor, Solicitor General, Tallahassee, Fla.|
|May 22 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Middle District of Florida. The record is electronic and not available on PACER|
|May 27 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined.|
|Jun 30 2014||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jul 2 2014||Record Returned for Supreme Court of Florida.|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.