|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-571||11th Cir.||Jan 8, 2019||Mar 4, 2019||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2018|
Holding: Registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on March 4, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 04 2017||Application (17A150) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 16, 2017 to October 13, 2017, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Aug 07 2017||Application (17A150) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 13, 2017.|
|Oct 13 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 15, 2017)|
|Oct 13 2017||Waiver of right of respondents Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2017.|
|Nov 02 2017||Response Requested. (Due December 4, 2017)|
|Nov 28 2017||Brief of respondents Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 13 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.|
|Dec 13 2017||Reply of petitioner Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2018||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 16 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 05 2018||Supplemental brief of petitioner Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 27 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018.|
|Jun 28 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 23 2018||Motion for an extension of time filed.|
|Jul 24 2018||Blanket Consent received from counsel of record for Petitioner, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation filed.|
|Jul 24 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp.|
|Jul 25 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al.|
|Jul 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2018. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 11, 2018.|
|Aug 24 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Aug 27 2018||Brief of petitioner Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. filed.|
|Sep 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Music Publishers' Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 04 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Copyright Alliance filed.|
|Sep 04 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.|
|Sep 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of Authors Guild and Other Artists' Rights Organizations filed.|
|Sep 04 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The International Trademark Association filed.|
|Oct 11 2018||Brief of respondents Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Oct 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Oct 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Oct 18 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 18 2018||Brief amici curiae of Authors and Educators filed.|
|Oct 18 2018||Brief amici curiae of Public Knowledge, et al. filed.|
|Oct 26 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 13 2018||Reply of petitioner Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. filed.|
|Nov 28 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 8, 2019|
|Nov 30 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 11 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.|
|Dec 13 2018||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern Dist. of Florida Fort Lauderdale Division is electronic and complete.|
|Dec 17 2018||Record from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jan 08 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Aaron M. Panner, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Peter K. Stris, Los Angeles, Cal.; and Jonathan Y. Ellis, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Mar 04 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 05 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.