|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-525||5th Cir.||Apr 22, 2019||Jun 2, 2019||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2018|
Holding: The charge-filing precondition to suit set out in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not a jurisdictional requirement.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 2, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 18 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)|
|Nov 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 19, 2018 to December 19, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2018.|
|Dec 19 2018||Brief of respondent Lois Davis in opposition filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Dec 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Dec 26 2018||Reply of petitioner Fort Bend County filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 11 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 29 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Lois Davis.|
|Feb 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Fort Bend County.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 22, 2019|
|Feb 25 2019||Brief of petitioner Fort Bend County filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Feb 27 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Scott Dodson in support of neither party filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of Center for Workplace Compliance, et al. filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Conference of State Legislatures, et al. filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 21 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Mar 27 2019||Brief of respondent Lois Davis filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association and The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 12 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 12 2019||Reply of petitioner Fort Bend County filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 22 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Raffi Melkonian, Houston, Tex.; and Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jun 03 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 05 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...