|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-113||6th Cir.||Not Argued||Dec 2, 2013||TBD||Per Curiam||OT 2013|
Issue: When, if ever, may a court exercising jurisdiction pursuant to a waiver of sovereign immunity invoke the strict construction canon applicable to such waivers to construe a separate statutory provision that creates the substantive rights at issue.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on December 2, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 12 2013||Application (12A1195) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 23, 2013 to July 24, 2013, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 13 2013||Application (12A1195) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 24, 2013.|
|Jul 24 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2013)|
|Aug 20 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 25, 2013.|
|Aug 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Sep 20 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 9, 2013.|
|Oct 9 2013||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Oct 22 2013||Reply of petitioner Ford Motor Company filed.|
|Oct 23 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 8, 2013.|
|Nov 12 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 15, 2013.|
|Nov 18 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 26, 2013.|
|Dec 2 2013||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Jan 3 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...
Our first TikTok of the new term. @katieleebarlow breaks down opening day.