|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-9572||Miss.||Mar 20, 2019||Jun 21, 2019||7-2||Kavanaugh||OT 2018|
Holding: The trial court at Curtis Flowers’ sixth murder trial committed clear error in concluding that the state’s peremptory strike of a particular black prospective juror was not motivated in substantial part by discriminatory intent.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 21, 2019. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined as to Parts I, II, and III.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 30 2018||Application (17A1205) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 23, 2018 to July 7, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|May 02 2018||Application (17A1205) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 22, 2018.|
|Jun 22 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2018)|
|Jul 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 26, 2018 to August 27, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 27, 2018.|
|Jul 26 2018||Brief amici curiae of Magnolia Bar Association, Mississippi Center for Justice, and Innocence Project New Orleans filed.|
|Aug 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 27, 2018 to September 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 26, 2018.|
|Sep 27 2018||Brief of respondent Mississippi in opposition filed.|
|Oct 09 2018||Reply of petitioner Curtis Flowers filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 02 2018||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in how it applied Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986), in this case.|
|Nov 20 2018||Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed.|
|Nov 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2018.|
|Dec 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 27 2018||Joint appendix filed (2 Volumes). (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 27 2018||Brief of petitioner Curtis Flowers filed.|
|Jan 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of Former Justice Department Officials filed.|
|Jan 08 2019||Motion of respondent for an extension of time filed.|
|Jan 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits is granted to and including February 7, 2019.|
|Jan 25 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 20, 2019|
|Feb 07 2019||Brief of respondent State of Mississippi filed.|
|Feb 14 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 26 2019||Record received from the Supreme Court of Mississippi is electronic and complete.|
|Mar 07 2019||Reply of petitioner Curtis Flowers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 20 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Sheri Lynn Johnson, Ithaca, N. Y. For respondent: Jason Davis, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jackson, Miss.|
|Jun 21 2019||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined as to Parts I, II, and III.|
|Jul 23 2019||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jul 23 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Nov 06 2019||MANDATE ISSUED.|
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.