|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-564||Fla. S. Ct.||Oct 31, 2012||Mar 26, 2013||5-4||Scalia||OT 2012|
Holding: A dog sniff at the front door of a house where the police suspected drugs were being grown constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 26, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 26 2011||Application (11A348) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 5, 2011 to October 27, 2011, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Oct 5 2011||Application (11A348) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 27, 2011.|
|Oct 26 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2011)|
|Oct 26 2011||Appendix of Florida filed.|
|Dec 2 2011||Brief of respondent Joelis Jardines in opposition filed.|
|Dec 2 2011||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent.|
|Dec 5 2011||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 14 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2012.|
|Dec 15 2011||Reply of petitioner Florida filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 6 2012||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jan 6 2012||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Wayne County, Michigan filed.|
|Feb 17 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 22, 2012.|
|Mar 21 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including April 26, 2012.|
|Apr 26 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Apr 26 2012||Brief of petitioner Florida filed.|
|Apr 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Police Canine Association and Police K-9 Magazine filed.|
|May 3 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|May 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|May 11 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 25, 2012.|
|Jun 25 2012||Brief of respondent Joelis Jardines filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed.|
|Jul 16 2012||Application (12A54) to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits from July 25, 2012 to August 9, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Jul 18 2012||Application (12A54) denied by Justice Thomas.|
|Jul 23 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 31, 2012|
|Jul 25 2012||Reply of petitioner Florida filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 2 2012||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 22 2012||Record received from Supreme Court of Florida. (1box)|
|Oct 31 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, Fla.|
|Mar 26 2013||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy and Breyer, JJ., joined.|
|Apr 29 2013||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jun 3 2013||Record returned to Supreme Court of Florida.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...