|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-886||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether it violates the First Amendment for state law to presume that the petitioner consents to subsidizing non-chargeable speech by the group he is compelled to fund (an “opt-out” rule), as opposed to an “opt-in” rule whereby the petitioner must affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech; and (2) whether Keller v. State Bar of California and Lathrop v. Donohue should be overruled insofar as they permit the state to force the petitioner to join a trade association he opposes as a condition of earning a living in his chosen profession.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 02 2017||Application (17A494) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 15, 2017 to January 14, 2018, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Nov 06 2017||Application (17A494) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 15, 2017.|
|Dec 15 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2018)|
|Jan 11 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2018 to February 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2018, for all respondents.|
|Jan 22 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Pacific Legal Foundation.|
|Jan 22 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, et al.|
|Feb 16 2018||Waiver of right of respondent Joe Wetch, Aubrey Fiebelkorn-Zuger, and Tony Weiler to respond filed.|
|Mar 07 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.|
|Mar 12 2018||Response Requested. (Due April 11, 2018)|
|Mar 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 11, 2018 to May 10, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 10, 2018, for all respondents.|
|Apr 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 10, 2018 to June 8, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 26 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 8, 2018, for all respondents.|
|Jun 08 2018||Brief of respondents Joe Wetch, Aubrey Fiebelkorn-Zuger, and Tony Weiler in opposition filed.|
|Jun 08 2018||Brief of respondent Penny Miller, Secretary-Treasurer of the State Board of Law Examiners in opposition filed.|
|Jun 22 2018||Reply of petitioner Arnold Fleck filed.|
|Jun 27 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Pacific Legal Foundation GRANTED.|
|Dec 03 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, et al. GRANTED.|
|Dec 03 2018||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees, 585 U. S. ___ (2018).|
|Jan 04 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.