|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-1214||Ill. App. Ct.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether the possibility of future blight is a permissible basis for a government to take property in an unblighted area and give it to a private party for private use; and (2) whether the Supreme Court should reconsider its decision in Kelo v. City of New London.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 26 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)|
|Mar 04 2021||Waiver of right of respondent City of Chicago, Illinois to respond filed.|
|Mar 10 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Response Requested. (Due April 14, 2021)|
|Mar 31 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2021 to May 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 02 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 14, 2021.|
|Apr 13 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Apr 13 2021||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation and National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed.|
|Apr 14 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Apr 14 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Apr 14 2021||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.|
|May 14 2021||Brief of respondent City of Chicago, Illinois in opposition filed.|
|May 26 2021||Reply of petitioner Fred J. Eychaner filed.|
|Jun 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.|
|Jun 21 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
|Jul 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.|
|Jul 02 2021||Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Gorsuch joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...