|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1091||10th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether a government may ban expressive conduct without first trying to advance its interests using less speech-restrictive measures, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit held below, in conflict with decisions of the Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 9th Circuits; and (2) whether a government may ban all expressive conduct in or near roadways on the ground that doing so is necessary to eliminate the risk of traffic accidents, as the 10th Circuit held below, in conflict with decisions of the Supreme Court and the 1st, 4th and 9th Circuits.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 02 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)|
|Mar 17 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Sandy City, et al. to respond filed.|
|Mar 25 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 07 2020||Response Requested. (Due May 7, 2020)|
|May 01 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 7, 2020 to June 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 04 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 8, 2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||Brief of respondents Sandy City, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 23 2020||Reply of petitioner Steve Ray Evans filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 04 2020||Letter of September 4, 2020 from counsel for petitioner filed.|
|Oct 05 2020||Petition DENIED.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...