Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-86 | 10th Cir. | Feb 25, 2015 | Jun 1, 2015 | 8-1 | Scalia | OT 2014 |
Holding: To prevail in a disparate-treatment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an applicant need show only that his need for an accommodation was a motivating factor in the employer’s decision, not that the employer actually knew of his need.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on June 1, 2015. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgement. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
May 16 2014 | Application (13A1139) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 27, 2014 to June 26, 2014, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. |
May 19 2014 | Application (13A1139) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 26, 2014. |
Jun 16 2014 | Application (13A1139) to extend further the time from June 26, 2014 to July 25, 2014, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. |
Jun 17 2014 | Application (13A1139) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 25, 2014. |
Jul 25 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2014) |
Aug 27 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Religious Organizations filed. |
Aug 27 2014 | Brief of respondent Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. in opposition filed. |
Sep 10 2014 | Reply of petitioner Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed. |
Sep 10 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014. |
Oct 2 2014 | Petition GRANTED. |
Oct 9 2014 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 26, 2014. |
Oct 9 2014 | The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 15, 2015. |
Nov 17 2014 | Order further extending time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits to and including December 3, 2014. |
Nov 17 2014 | Order further extending time to file respondent's brief on the merits to and including January 21, 2015. |
Dec 3 2014 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.) |
Dec 3 2014 | Brief of petitioner Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed. |
Dec 9 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Umme-Hani Khan filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amici curiae of American Jewish Committee, et al. filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, et al. filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amici curiae of National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs, et al. filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Fifteen Religious and Civil Rights Organizations filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of The Council on American-Islamic Relations filed. |
Dec 22 2014 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, February 25, 2015 |
Dec 22 2014 | Record requested from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit. |
Dec 30 2014 | Record received from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit. The record is electronic and located on PACER, also received 1-Box of pleadings in the case. |
Jan 7 2015 | CIRCULATED. |
Jan 21 2015 | Brief of respondent Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 28 2015 | Brief amicus curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 28 2015 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 28 2015 | Brief amici curiae of The National Conference of State Legislatures, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 28 2015 | Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 18 2015 | Reply of petitioner Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 25 2015 | Argued. For petitioner: Ian H. Gershengorn, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C. |
Jun 1 2015 | Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. |
Jul 6 2015 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
Jul 21 2015 | Record from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit has been returned. |
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
www.scotusblog.com
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
www.scotusblog.com
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.