|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-7848||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 16|
Issue: (1) Whether capital defense counsel may decide to present evidence of a single mitigating factor without having first conducted a thorough investigation of other potential mitigating factors and whether counsel's post-hoc concern about possible rebuttal evidence justifies the failure to investigate; and (2) whether, where a state court provides a reasoned decision denying relief, 18 U.S.C. Section 2254(d) permits a federal court to ignore the reasoning of the state court and substitute its own reasons for denying relief and whether the violent nature of the crime lessens the prejudice from unconstitutional shackling.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 19 2015||Application (15A550) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 2, 2015 to January 16, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Nov 24 2015||Application (15A550) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until January 19, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2016)|
|Feb 03 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioner Clark Elmore filed.|
|Feb 26 2016||Brief of respondent Donald R. Holbrook, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary in opposition filed.|
|Mar 08 2016||Reply of petitioner Clark Elmore filed.|
|Mar 17 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 1, 2016.|
|Mar 24 2016||Record Requested.|
|Mar 24 2016||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER.|
|Mar 25 2016||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Western District of Washington. The record is electronic and available on PACER, except for one sealed document provided electronically.|
|Mar 31 2016||Record received from Washington State Courts (3 boxes).|
|Apr 07 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 22, 2016.|
|Apr 13 2016||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 25 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 29, 2016.|
|Apr 25 2016||Rescheduled.|
|May 09 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 12, 2016.|
|May 09 2016||Rescheduled.|
|May 11 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.|
|May 31 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 2, 2016.|
|Jun 06 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 9, 2016.|
|Jun 13 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 16, 2016.|
|Jun 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.|
|Sep 19 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.|
|Oct 03 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016.|
|Oct 11 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 14, 2016.|
|Oct 17 2016||Petition DENIED Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
|Nov 03 2016||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|Nov 15 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 2, 2016.|
|Dec 05 2016||Rehearing DENIED.|
|Aug 16 2017||Record returned to the U.S.D.C.-Western District of Washington (3 boxes of Washington State Court records).|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.