|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-717||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2021|
Issues: (1) Whether a state governor’s order mandating that private healthcare employers, on penalty of revocation of their business licenses, terminate their healthcare workers who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19, and deny any worker’s request for religious accommodation from the mandate while allowing medical exemptions from the mandate, violates the employers’ and employees’ rights under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment; (2) whether, under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution, a state governor’s order mandating that private healthcare employers, on penalty of revocation of their business licenses, terminate their healthcare workers who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19 with no opportunity for any worker to seek a religious accommodation from the mandate, is preempted by the religious accommodation provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and (3) whether Article III courts have incidental equitable powers to grant preliminary injunctive relief to employees in aid of their Title VII remedies when the harm suffered by the employees in the absence of injunctive relief has a chilling effect on their religious free exercise and protection from religious discrimination.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 20 2021||Application (21A90) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Breyer.|
|Oct 20 2021||Response to application (21A90) requested by Justice Breyer, due Monday, October 25, by noon.|
|Oct 22 2021||Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by religious and civil rights organizations.|
|Oct 25 2021||Response to application from respondents MaineHealth, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2021||Response to application from respondents Janet T. Mills, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2021||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.|
|Oct 27 2021||Reply of applicants John Does 1-3, et al. filed.|
|Oct 28 2021||Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Public Health Associates and Scholars.|
|Oct 29 2021||Application (21A90) referred to the Court.|
|Oct 29 2021||Application (21A90) denied by the Court. The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE BREYER and by him referred to the Court is denied. JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom JUSTICE KAVANAUGH joins, concurring in the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO join, dissenting from the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion).|
|Nov 11 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)|
|Nov 17 2021||Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioners John Does 1–3, et al.|
|Nov 22 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 22 2021||Response to motion from respondents Janet T. Mills, Jeanne M. Lambrew, Nirav D. Shah filed.|
|Nov 23 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 23 2021||Response to motion from respondents MaineHealth; Genesis HealthCare of Maine LLC, et al. filed.|
|Nov 24 2021||The motions to extend the time to file responses are denied.|
|Nov 24 2021||Reply in support of motion to expedite consideration of petition filed.|
|Dec 06 2021||Motion expedite consideration of petition for writ of certiorari DENIED.|
|Dec 14 2021||Brief of respondents MaineHealth; Genesis HealthCare of Maine LLC; Genesis HealthCare LLC; MaineGeneral Health in opposition filed.|
|Dec 14 2021||Brief of respondents Janet T. Mills, Jeanne M. Lambrew, Nirav D. Shah in opposition filed.|
|Dec 15 2021||Brief of respondent Northern Light Health Foundation in opposition filed.|
|Dec 29 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.|
|Jan 11 2022||Reply of petitioners John Does 1–3, et al. filed.|
|Jan 13 2022||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 18 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.|
|Jan 19 2022||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 11 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.|
|Feb 22 2022||Petition DENIED.|
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf
JUST IN: The Biden administration, as expected, asks the Supreme Court to revive Biden's student-loan relief plan. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit blocked the government from implementing the plan; Biden wants SCOTUS to lift that ruling. https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/22A444-2.pdf
JUST IN: The Supreme Court DENIES Arizona GOP chair Kelli Ward's bid to block the Jan. 6 committee from reviewing her phone records. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissent from the court's brief, unexplained order denying Ward's request.
NEW: Another fight on the shadow docket over a subpoena seeking information about election interference. Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward is asking SCOTUS to block the Jan. 6 committee's subpoena for her phone records. Here's Ward's filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A350.pdf