|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-658||3d. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether, given students’ constitutionally protected privacy interest in their partially clothed bodies, a public school has a compelling interest in authorizing students who believe themselves to be members of the opposite sex to use locker rooms and restrooms reserved exclusively for the opposite sex, and whether such a policy is narrowly tailored; and (2) whether the Boyertown policy constructively denies access to locker room and restroom facilities under Title IX “on the basis of sex,” 20 U.S.C. § 1681.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 10 2018||Application (18A397) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 24, 2018 to December 21, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Oct 17 2018||Application (18A397) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 19, 2018.|
|Nov 19 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)|
|Nov 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 21, 2018 to January 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Nov 27 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Joel Doe, et al.|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Institute for Faith and Family filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Women's Liberation Front filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||Brief amici curiae of Miriam Grossman, M.D., et al. filed.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars filed.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Hands Across the Aisle filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Walt Heyer filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ryan T. Anderson.(12/26/2018)|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of William J. Bennett filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of Christian Educators Association International, et al. filed.|
|Dec 26 2018||Amicus brief of Ryan T. Anderson not accepted for filing. (December 26, 2018)(Corrected version submitted)|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief of respondents Boyertown Area School District, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 22 2019||Brief of respondent Pennsylvania Youth Congress Foundation in opposition filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 12 2019||Reply of petitioners Joel Doe, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 21 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.|
|Feb 28 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.|
|Mar 14 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.|
|Mar 21 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.|
|Mar 27 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 08 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 09 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.|
|Apr 16 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|Apr 24 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 06 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 14 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|May 28 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ryan T. Anderson GRANTED.|
|May 28 2019||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.