|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-658||3d. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether, given students’ constitutionally protected privacy interest in their partially clothed bodies, a public school has a compelling interest in authorizing students who believe themselves to be members of the opposite sex to use locker rooms and restrooms reserved exclusively for the opposite sex, and whether such a policy is narrowly tailored; and (2) whether the Boyertown policy constructively denies access to locker room and restroom facilities under Title IX “on the basis of sex,” 20 U.S.C. § 1681.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 10 2018||Application (18A397) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 24, 2018 to December 21, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Oct 17 2018||Application (18A397) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 19, 2018.|
|Nov 19 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)|
|Nov 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 21, 2018 to January 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Nov 27 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Joel Doe, et al.|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Institute for Faith and Family filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Women's Liberation Front filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||Brief amici curiae of Miriam Grossman, M.D., et al. filed.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars filed.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Hands Across the Aisle filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Walt Heyer filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ryan T. Anderson.(12/26/2018)|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of William J. Bennett filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of Christian Educators Association International, et al. filed.|
|Dec 26 2018||Amicus brief of Ryan T. Anderson not accepted for filing. (December 26, 2018)(Corrected version submitted)|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief of respondents Boyertown Area School District, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 22 2019||Brief of respondent Pennsylvania Youth Congress Foundation in opposition filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 12 2019||Reply of petitioners Joel Doe, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 21 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.|
|Feb 28 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.|
|Mar 14 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.|
|Mar 21 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.|
|Mar 27 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 08 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 09 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.|
|Apr 16 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|Apr 24 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 06 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 14 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|May 28 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ryan T. Anderson GRANTED.|
|May 28 2019||Petition DENIED.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...