Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22-517 | 11th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2022 |
Issues: (1) Whether district courts may be required to use the inherently subjective and effectively unreviewable factors to determine common-fund fee awards set out in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. despite the court’s rejection of the that approach in Perdue v. Kenny; (2) whether district courts may be required to calculate common-fund attorney’s fees only as a percentage of the fund, or may instead award fees based on the attorney’s lodestar; and (3) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit may mandate that district courts adopt a 25% “benchmark” for percent-of-fund attorney’s fee awards.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Oct 21 2022 | Application (22A343) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2022 to December 21, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
Oct 26 2022 | Application (22A343) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 1, 2022. |
Dec 01 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2023) |
Dec 09 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Charles Johnson to respond filed. |
Jan 11 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
Jan 18 2023 | Response Requested. (Due February 17, 2023) |
Feb 13 2023 | Brief of respondent Charles Johnson in opposition filed. |
Mar 01 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023. |
Mar 03 2023 | Reply of petitioner Jenna Dickenson filed. (Distributed) |
Mar 13 2023 | Rescheduled. |
Mar 29 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023. |
Apr 03 2023 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Jenna Dickenson filed. VIDED. (Distributed) |
Apr 17 2023 | Petition DENIED. |