|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-706||6th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2016|
Issue: Whether the Freedom of Information Act requires disclosure of booking photos of publicly named, federal indictees who have already appeared in open court.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 15 2016||Application (16A286) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 12, 2016 to November 26, 2016, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 19 2016||Application (16A286) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 26, 2016.|
|Nov 22 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2016)|
|Dec 7 2016||Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice to respond filed.|
|Dec 14 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.|
|Dec 20 2016||Response Requested . (Due January 19, 2017)|
|Dec 28 2016||Brief amici curiae of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 28 Media Organizations filed.|
|Jan 12 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2017.|
|Feb 21 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 12, 2017.|
|Apr 12 2017||Brief of respondent Department of Justice in opposition filed.|
|Apr 28 2017||Reply of petitioner Detroit Free Press, Inc. filed.|
|May 2 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.|
|May 22 2017||Petition DENIED.|
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Experts continue to analyze last week's Fulton decision. Here are the final pieces in our symposium.
Thomas Berg & Douglas Laycock on the future of free-exercise challenges: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/protecting-free-exercise-under-smith-and-after-smith/
Holly Hollman on the ruling's many unresolved questions: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/court-requires-religious-exemption-but-leaves-many-questions-unanswered/
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.