|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1080||D.C. Cir.||Dec 8, 2014||Mar 9, 2015||9-0||Kennedy||OT 2014|
Holding: For purposes of the validity of the “metrics and standards,” formulated together with the Federal Railroad Association, addressing the performance and scheduling of passenger railroad services, including Amtrak’s on-time performance and train delays caused by host railroads, Amtrak is a governmental entity.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on March 9, 2015. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 27 2013||Application (13A678) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 9, 2014 to February 7, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 31 2013||Application (13A678) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 7, 2014.|
|Jan 27 2014||Application (13A678) to extend further the time from February 7, 2014 to March 10, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 28 2014||Application (13A678) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 10, 2014.|
|Mar 10 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2014)|
|Mar 18 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 12, 2014.|
|Apr 10 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Alexander Volokh filed.|
|May 12 2014||Brief of respondent Association of American Railroads in opposition filed.|
|May 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.|
|May 28 2014||Reply of petitioner Department of Transportation filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 16 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 23 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 21 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 14, 2014.|
|Jul 21 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 22, 2014.|
|Aug 14 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 14 2014||Brief of petitioner Department of Transportation filed.|
|Aug 21 2014||Brief amici curiae of Environmental Law and Policy Center, et al. filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, December 8, 2014.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief of respondent Association of American Railroads filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Sep 26 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit, the record is electronic.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Independent Passenger Rail Operators filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Resolute Forest Products Inc. filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Council of Trustees and Alumni, et al. filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Center for the Rule of Law filed.|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Alexander Volokh filed.|
|Oct 22 2014||Reply of petitioner Department of Transportation filed.|
|Oct 27 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 8 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Thomas H. Dupree, Jr., Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 19 2014||Letter from counsel for the petitioners updating authority. (Distributed)|
|Mar 9 2015||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.|
|Apr 10 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.