|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1328||D.C. Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether an impeachment trial before a legislative body is a “judicial proceeding” under Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 07 2020||Application (19A1035) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|May 08 2020||UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, case No. 19-5288, is hereby stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before Monday, May 18, 2020, by 3 p.m. ET, and further order of The Chief Justice or of the Court.|
|May 18 2020||Response to application from respondent House Committee on the Judiciary filed.|
|May 19 2020||Reply of applicant Department of Justice filed.|
|May 20 2020||Application (19A1035) granted. The application for stay of the mandate presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted. The issuance of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, case No. 19-5288, is stayed pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such petition is filed on or before June 1, 2020, by 5 p.m. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the judgment of this Court. If no petition for a writ of certiorari is filed on or before June 1, 2020, by 5 p.m., the stay shall terminate.|
|Jun 01 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2020)|
|Jun 15 2020||Brief of respondent House Committee on the Judiciary in opposition filed.|
|Jun 18 2020||Reply of petitioner Department of Justice filed.|
|Jun 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition GRANTED.|
|Aug 03 2020||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Aug 10 2020||Joint motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 31, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2020.|
|Aug 31 2020||Brief of petitioner Department of Justice filed.|
|Aug 31 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner.|
|Sep 16 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 2, 2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Oct 08 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Oct 14 2020||Brief of respondent House Committee on the Judiciary filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. D.C. Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, some of the record has been electronically filed.|
|Oct 21 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Oct 27 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Department of Justice filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 17 2020||Motion to remove the case from the December 2020 argument calendar filed by respondent House Committee on the Judiciary. (Distributed)|
|Nov 19 2020||Response to motion to remove the case from the December 2020 argument calendar from petitioner Department of Justice filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2020||Motion to remove the case from the December 2020 argument calendar GRANTED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.