Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

This week, we are hosting a symposium before oral argument on December 2 in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. Click here to read the contributions.

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):

Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-161 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2019

Issue: Whether, as applied to the respondent, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(2) is unconstitutional under the suspension clause.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
May 24 2019Application (18A1219) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 5, 2019 to July 5, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
May 24 2019Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
May 24 2019Application (18A1219) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 5, 2019.
Jun 25 2019Application (18A1219) to extend further the time from July 5, 2019 to August 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Jun 26 2019Application (18A1219) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 4, 2019.
Aug 02 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2019)
Sep 04 2019Brief of respondent Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam in opposition filed.
Sep 18 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
Sep 19 2019Reply of petitioners Department of Homeland Security, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 15 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
Oct 18 2019Petition GRANTED.
Oct 18 2019As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
Oct 30 2019Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
Term Snapshot
At a Glance