|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1509||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in vacating the district court’s finding of no bad faith in the government’s conduct in this novel litigation brought by a foreign national living outside the United States, asserting a due process right to challenge her presence on the No Fly List and other government lists and databases.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 22 2019||Application (18A954) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 2, 2019 to May 2, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch. (Justice Kagan is recused.)|
|Mar 25 2019||Application (18A954) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 2, 2019.|
|Apr 19 2019||Application (18A954) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 2, 2019 to May 31, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Apr 22 2019||Application (18A954) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 31, 2019.|
|May 31 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)|
|Jun 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2019 to August 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of respondent Rahinah Ibrahim in opposition filed.|
|Aug 21 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 11 2019||Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioners Department of Homeland Security, et al. (Distributed)|
|Sep 11 2019||Reply brief of petitioners filed.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Oct 15 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Alito would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.