|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1509||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in vacating the district court’s finding of no bad faith in the government’s conduct in this novel litigation brought by a foreign national living outside the United States, asserting a due process right to challenge her presence on the No Fly List and other government lists and databases.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 22 2019||Application (18A954) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 2, 2019 to May 2, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch. (Justice Kagan is recused.)|
|Mar 25 2019||Application (18A954) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 2, 2019.|
|Apr 19 2019||Application (18A954) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 2, 2019 to May 31, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Apr 22 2019||Application (18A954) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 31, 2019.|
|May 31 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)|
|Jun 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2019 to August 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of respondent Rahinah Ibrahim in opposition filed.|
|Aug 21 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 11 2019||Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioners Department of Homeland Security, et al. (Distributed)|
|Sep 11 2019||Reply brief of petitioners filed.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Oct 15 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Alito would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...