|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-339||4th Cir. _||Apr 23, 2014||Jun 9, 2014||7-2||Kennedy||OT 2013|
Holding: North Carolina’s statute of repose is not preempted by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), which instead only preempts state statutes of limitations on bringing state-law environmental tort cases.
Judgment: Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 9, 2014. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas and Justice Alito joined the opinion except as to Part II-D. Justice Scalia filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgement, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Breyer joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 22 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Sep 13 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2013)|
|Oct 3 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 18, 2013.|
|Nov 14 2013||Brief of respondents Peter Waldburger, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 25 2013||Reply of petitioner CTS Corporation filed.|
|Dec 4 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.|
|Jan 10 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jan 23 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner CTS Corporation.|
|Feb 11 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 23, 2014|
|Feb 14 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Western District of North Carolina is electronic (Not on PACER).|
|Feb 18 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit. (1 - Envelope)|
|Feb 24 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Feb 24 2014||Brief of petitioner CTS Corporation filed.|
|Feb 28 2014||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Mar 3 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Mar 3 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Chemistry Council, et al. filed.|
|Mar 10 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 26 2014||Brief of respondents Peter Waldburger, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Apr 1 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Natural Resources Defense Council filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 2 2014||Brief amici curiae of Jerry Ensminger, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 2 2014||Brief amici curiae of Environmental Law Professors filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 11 2014||Reply of petitioner CTS Corporation filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 18 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 23 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Brian J. Murray, Chicago, Ill.; and Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: John J. Korzen, Winston-Salem, N. C.|
|Jun 9 2014||Judgment REVERSED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part II-D. Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined that opinion in full, and Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined as to all but Part II-D. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, J., joined.|
|Jul 2 2014||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|Jul 17 2014||DISTRIBUTED.|
|Aug 11 2014||Rehearing DENIED.|
|Aug 11 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 11 2014||Record returned for U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up NINE new cases, including Gonzalez v. Google, involving the scope of tech companies' immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The order list is not yet posted on the court's website, but here is a link: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/100322ZOR.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: It's the opening day of the 2022-23 term. At 9:30 a.m. EDT, the court will issue orders, which may include cert grants from last week's "long conference." Then, at 10, the court will hear two arguments as Ketanji Brown Jackson takes the bench for the first time.
Goodbye SCOTUS, a fond farewell . . .
Goodbye SCOTUS, A Fond Farewell - Art Lien, Courtartist
Tomorrow begins a new term for the Court, and I won’t be there. My first visit to the Supreme Court was ...
And then there were four. (Photo from before yesterday's investiture of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, by the Supreme Court of the United States.)
Art Lien, AKA @Courtartist, retired over the summer after 45 years drawing the Supreme Court. For the last nine of those years, Art worked for SCOTUSblog. We're honoring his journalism with a retrospective on his work. Trust us, it's a feast for the eyes:
Forty-five years of visual journalism from a supremely talented court artist - SCOTUSblog
For 45 years, Arthur Lien witnessed, sketched, and recorded for posterity some of the Supreme Court's most historic ...
Justice Jackson's investiture ceremony has concluded. After the ceremony, she took the traditional walk down the court's front steps, accompanied by the chief justice. She also shared a moment with her husband, Patrick, on the plaza after the ceremony. Photos by @katieleebarlow.
Today at SCOTUS: The investiture of Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve as a justice. Jackson was sworn in over the summer, so the investiture is purely ceremonial. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris reportedly are expected to attend the invite-only event at the court.