|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-439||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether reduced scrutiny of compelled commercial speech under Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio applies beyond the need to prevent consumer deception; and (2) whether, when Zauderer applies, it is sufficient that the compelled speech be (a) factually accurate – even if controversial and, when read as a whole, potentially misleading; and (b) merely reasonably related to any non-“trivial” governmental interest.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 30 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)|
|Oct 03 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, CTIA – The Wireless Association®|
|Oct 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, City of Berkeley, California, et al.|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Oct 31 2019||Brief amici curiae of Institute for Justice and National Federation of Independent Business filed.|
|Oct 31 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Association of National Advertisers, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc.,et al. filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Brief of respondents City of Berkeley, California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Nov 19 2019||Reply of petitioner CTIA – The Wireless Association® filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||Petition DENIED.|
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.