Skip to content

Crow v. Fontenot

Petition for certiorari denied on June 6, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-970 10th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: Whether "new" evidence, as referred to in Schlup v. Delo and McQuiggin v. Perkins, means evidence that was not available at the time of trial or, under the broad reading adopted below, encompasses any evidence, including evidence known by the defendant and/or available with due diligence, not presented at trial.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/03/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
01/24/2022Waiver of right of respondent Karl Fontenot to respond filed.
01/26/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
02/01/2022Response Requested. (Due March 3, 2022)
02/16/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 3, 2022 to May 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
02/17/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 2, 2022.
05/02/2022Brief of respondent Karl Fontenot in opposition filed.
05/11/2022Reply of petitioner Scott Crow filed.
05/17/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
06/06/2022Petition DENIED.