|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether, under controlling Supreme Court authority, a federal court must apply a state law prohibition on “loss of life” damages in survival claims pursued via 42 U.S.C. § 1983, or whether a state limitation on abstract, speculative damages of this type is inconsistent with the purposes of Section 1983.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 17 2022||Application (21A848) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 28, 2022 to August 26, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 23 2022||Application (21A848) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 26, 2022.|
|Aug 26 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2022)|
|Sep 22 2022||Waiver of right of respondent Kathy Craig, et al. to respond filed.|
|Sep 28 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.|
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...
Our first TikTok of the new term. @katieleebarlow breaks down opening day.