|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-955||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 16|
Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. § 318(b) violates Article III of the Constitution, to the extent that it empowers an executive agency tribunal to assert judicial power canceling private property rights among private parties embroiled in a private federal dispute of a type known in the common law courts of 1789, rather than merely issue an advisory opinion as an adjunct to a trial court.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 21 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 29, 2016)|
|Feb 1 2016||Consent to filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for petitioners.|
|Feb 4 2016||Petitioner's amended Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement received.|
|Feb 25 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 30, 2016.|
|Feb 29 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Adam Mossoff filed.|
|Feb 29 2016||Brief amici curiae of Security People, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Mar 28 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 11, 2016.|
|Apr 11 2016||Brief of respondent Michelle K. Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office in opposition filed.|
|Apr 25 2016||Reply of petitioners J. Carl Cooper, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 26 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 12, 2016.|
|May 2 2016||Rescheduled.|
|Jul 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.|
|Oct 3 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016.|
|Oct 11 2016||Petition DENIED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.