|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether a tax singling out off-premises billboards is subject to heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 12 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 15, 2021)|
|Sep 02 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC|
|Sep 15 2021||Brief of respondent Henry J. Raymond in opposition filed.|
|Sep 15 2021||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Out of Home Advertising Association of America.|
|Sep 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Sep 22 2021||Response to motion from respondent Henry J. Raymond filed.|
|Sep 28 2021||Reply of petitioner Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 29 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.