|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-672||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires law enforcement officers to provide accommodations to an armed, violent and mentally ill suspect in the course of bringing the suspect into custody; (2) whether, under the Fourth Amendment “totality of the circumstances” analysis for assessing the reasonableness of force used against a suspect who attacks law enforcement officers, a court must take into account allegedly unreasonable police conduct that took place before the use of force, but foreseeably created the need to use that force; and (3) whether, under the Fourth Amendment’s analysis for use of force, a law enforcement officer’s interest in using deadly force against a suspect threatening an officer’s life is diminished if the assailant is mentally ill.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)|
|Dec 20 2018||Waiver of right of respondents Richard Vos, et al. to respond filed.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of California State Association of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Jan 02 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Jan 09 2019||Response Requested. (Due February 8, 2019)|
|Jan 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2019 to March 10, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2019. See Rule 30.1.|
|Mar 11 2019||Brief of respondents Richard Vos, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 25 2019||Reply of petitioners City of Newport Beach, a governmental entity; Richard Henry; Nathan Farris filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 27 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.|
|Apr 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|May 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster