|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-157||1st Cir.||Mar 24, 2021||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement extends to the home.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 10 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)|
|Sep 02 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 14, 2020 to October 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 03 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 14, 2020.|
|Oct 14 2020||Brief of respondents Robert Strom, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 27 2020||Reply of petitioner Edward A. Caniglia filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 27 2020||Supplemental brief of respondents Robert Strom, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.|
|Nov 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.|
|Nov 20 2020||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 02 2020||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Dec 08 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 8, 20201. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including February 11, 2021.|
|Dec 16 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Robert Strom, et al.|
|Jan 08 2021||Brief of petitioner Edward A. Caniglia filed.|
|Jan 08 2021||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jan 13 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jan 14 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Second Amendment Foundation filed.|
|Jan 14 2021||Amicus brief of American Association of Suicidology not accepted for filing. (January 28, 2021)|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, The Heller Foundation, and Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amici curiae of Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., California Rifle and Pistol Association, Gun Owners of California filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union et al. filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition, et al. filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amici curiae of Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability and Restore the Fourth Inc. filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of American Association of Suicidology filed.|
|Feb 01 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 24, 2021.|
|Feb 04 2021||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.|
|Feb 11 2021||Brief of respondents Robert Strom, et al. filed.|
|Feb 17 2021||Amicus brief of The National Association of Counties, et al. not accepted for filing. (Dupilicate submission - February 25, 2021)|
|Feb 17 2021||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Counties, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 18 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Feb 18 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Feb 18 2021||Brief amici curiae of Iowa, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 22 2021||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 08 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Mar 12 2021||Reply of petitioner Edward A. Caniglia filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 24 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Marc DeSisto, Providence, R. I.; and Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
We’ve gotten roughly half of the merits opinions for the term so far. Kavanaugh is trending as the median justice and appears to be supplanting Roberts.
Of course, that could all change by June. Here’s the first in a series on interim stats from the term.
On a new, conservative court, Kavanaugh sits at the center - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first in a series on interim statistics from the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. The Supreme Cou...
The Supreme Court will release orders and opinion(s?) on Monday May 17.
Order list at 9:30 a.m. EDT. Opinions at 10:00.
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.