Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-210 7th Cir. Apr 14, 2008
Tr.Aud.
Jun 9, 2008 9-0 Thomas OT 2007

Holding: A plaintiff asserting a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act predicated on mail fraud need not show, either as an element of its claim or as a prerequisite to establishing proximate causation, that it relied on the defendant's alleged misrepresentations.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on June 9, 2008.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits briefs

Amicus briefs

Certiorari filings

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards