|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-816||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether an abortion clinic may assert third-party standing on behalf of its hypothetical minor patients to challenge a statute requiring parental notice before abortion; and (2) whether Indiana may, consistent with the 14th Amendment, generally require lawyers for unemancipated minors to notify parents of court-authorized abortions, subject to judicial bypass upon a finding that such notice would be against the minor’s best interests.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 27 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)|
|Jan 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2020 to February 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 15 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 26, 2020.|
|Jan 27 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed.|
|Jan 27 2020||Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed.|
|Jan 27 2020||Brief amici curiae of Priests for Life and Rachel's Vineyard filed.|
|Feb 26 2020||Brief of respondent Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 10 2020||Reply of petitioners Kristina Box, et al. filed.|
|Mar 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).|
|Aug 03 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.