Bondi v. Dana’s Railroad Supply
Petition for certiorari denied on April 3, 2017
Issue: Whether Florida's nearly thirty-year-old Surcharge Statute is a facially unconstitutional speech restriction, as the Eleventh Circuit held, or whether such a law regulates only conduct and does not even implicate the First Amendment, as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Mar 31 2016 | Application (15A1021) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 12, 2016 to June 6, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
| Apr 7 2016 | Application (15A1021) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 6, 2016. |
| Jun 6 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2016) |
| Jun 17 2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 8, 2016, for all respondents. |
| Aug 5 2016 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 15, 2016, for all respondents. |
| Aug 15 2016 | Brief of respondents Dana's Railroad Supply, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Aug 29 2016 | Reply of petitioner Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida filed. |
| Aug 31 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
| Mar 29 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017. |
| Apr 3 2017 | Petition DENIED. |
