|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-248||4th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2021|
Issues: (1) Whether a state agent authorized by state law to defend the state’s interest in litigation must overcome a presumption of adequate representation to intervene as of right in a case in which a state official is a defendant; (2) whether a district court’s determination of adequate representation in ruling on a motion to intervene as of right is reviewed de novo or for abuse of discretion; and (3) whether petitioners Philip Berger, the president pro tempore of the state senate, and Timothy Moore, the speaker of the state house of representatives, are entitled to intervene as of right in this litigation.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 19 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)|
|Aug 26 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2021 to October 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 27 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 13, 2021.|
|Oct 13 2021||Waiver of right of respondents North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, Chapel Hill-Carrboro NAACP, Greensboro NAACP, High Point NAACP, Moore County NAACP, Stokes County Branch of the NAACP, Winston Salem-Forsyth County NAACP to respond filed.|
|Oct 13 2021||Brief of respondents Damon Circosta, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 27 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.|
|Oct 27 2021||Reply of petitioners Philip E. Berger, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.|
|Nov 24 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 10 2022||Brief of petitioners Philip E. Berger, et al. filed.|
|Jan 10 2022||Joint appendix filed.|
|Jan 17 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Republican State Leadership Committee filed.|
|Jan 17 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Jan 17 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin Legislature filed.|
|Jan 18 2022||Brief amici curiae of Lawyers Democracy Fund and Rep. Rodney Davis filed.|
|Jan 18 2022||Brief amicus curiae of American Legislative Exchange Council filed.|
|Jan 18 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Republican National Committee filed.|
|Jan 18 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Honest Elections Project filed.|
|Jan 18 2022||Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed.|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722