|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-8544||11th Cir.||Nov 28, 2016||Mar 6, 2017||7-0||Thomas||OT 2016|
Holding: The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, including Section 4B1.2(a)'s residual clause, are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause.
Judgment: Affirmed, 7-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on March 6, 2017. Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opinion. Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 09 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2016)|
|Apr 07 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2016.|
|May 10 2016||Letter dated May 6, 2016, received from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply brief pursuant to Rule 15.5.|
|May 13 2016||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 18 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 2, 2016.|
|May 23 2016||Reply of petitioner Travis Beckles filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 06 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 9, 2016.|
|Jun 08 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioner Travis Beckles filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 13 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 16, 2016.|
|Jun 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.|
|Aug 11 2016||Adam K. Mortara, Esquire, of Chicago, Illinois, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below on Question 2 presented by the petition. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.|
|Aug 11 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 11 2016||Brief of petitioner Travis Beckles filed.|
|Aug 16 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 19, 2016.|
|Aug 16 2016||The time to file the brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below on Question 2 presented by the petition is extended to and including October 21, 2016.|
|Aug 16 2016||Briefs of other amici curiae in support of the judgment below on Question 2 presented by the petition are to be filed on or before October 28, 2016.|
|Aug 18 2016||Brief amici curiae of Federal Public and Community Defenders, and the National Association of Federal Defenders filed.|
|Aug 18 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Scholars of Criminal Law, Federal Courts, and Sentencing filed.|
|Sep 19 2016||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Oct 20 2016||Motion for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument filed by respondent United States.|
|Oct 21 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 28, 2016|
|Oct 21 2016||Brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below on Question 2 filed.|
|Oct 26 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 01 2016||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.|
|Nov 14 2016||Motion for additional time to argue by respondent GRANTED. and the time is divided as follows: 25 minutes for petitioner, 25 minutes for respondent, and 15 minutes for the Court-appointed amicus curiae. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Nov 15 2016||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Florida 1 Envelope. Also received from the Southern District of Florida are SEALED documents, these records are electronic.|
|Nov 17 2016||Reply of petitioner Travis Beckles filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2016||Reply of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 28 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Janice L. Bergmann, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Adam K. Mortara, Chicago, Ill. (Appointed by this Court.)|
|Mar 06 2017||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion. Ginsburg, J., and Sotomayor, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Kagan, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Apr 07 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 28 2017||Record from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Florida has been returned.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.