Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-1071 | Fed. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2013 |
Issue: (1) Whether an Article III court’s final judgment may be reversed based on the decision of an administrative agency; and (2) whether a final determination of liability that has been affirmed on appeal may be reversed based on the decision of an administrative agency merely because an appeal regarding the post-verdict remedy is pending.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jan 13 2014 | Application (13A733) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 3, 2014 to March 5, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jan 14 2014 | Application (13A733) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 5, 2014. |
Mar 5 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2014) |
Mar 21 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
Apr 7 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Medtronic, Inc filed. |
Apr 7 2014 | Brief of respondents Fresenius USA, Inc., et al. in opposition filed. |
Apr 7 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Biotechnology Industry Organization filed. |
Apr 7 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. |
Apr 7 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed. |
Apr 21 2014 | Reply of petitioners Baxter International, Inc., et al. filed. |
Apr 22 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 15, 2014. |
May 19 2014 | Petition DENIED. |
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
www.scotusblog.com
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
www.whitehouse.gov
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.