|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-770||2d Cir.||Nov 1, 2012||Feb 19, 2013||6-3||Kennedy||OT 2012|
Holding: The rule in Michigan v. Summers that officers executing a search warrant are permitted “to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted” is limited to the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched and does not apply when a recent occupant of the premises was detained at a point beyond any reasonable understanding of the immediate vicinity of the premises in question.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on February 19, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan joined. Justice Breyer filled a dissenting opinion in which Justice Thomas and Justice Alito joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 16 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2012)|
|Jan 12 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2012.|
|Jan 19 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Feb 15 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 22, 2012.|
|Mar 19 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 5, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 3, 2012.|
|May 3 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 14 2012||Reply of petitioner Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo filed.|
|May 15 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 31, 2012.|
|Jun 4 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 8 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 3, 2012.|
|Jun 8 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 17, 2012.|
|Jul 16 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 30, 2012|
|Aug 2 2012||Transcripts received from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of New York. (10 volumes)|
|Aug 3 2012||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 3 2012||Brief of petitioner Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo filed.|
|Aug 10 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Aug 10 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.|
|Aug 10 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed.|
|Aug 13 2012||Record from U.S.C.A. for Second Circuit is electronic.|
|Aug 15 2012||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of New York is electronic.|
|Aug 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 27 2012||Order further extending time to file respondent's brief on the merits to and including September 20, 2012.|
|Sep 20 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Michigan, Twenty Three (23) Other States, and One (1) Territory filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 15 2012||Reply of petitioner Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2012||RESET FOR ARGUMENT ON Thursday, November 1, 1012.|
|Nov 1 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Jeffrey B. Wall, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 19 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined.|
|Mar 25 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Apr 18 2013||Record (Transcripts) returned to U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of New York.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.