Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15-363 | D.C. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2015 |
Issue: Whether a relator asserting a claim under the False Claims Act can satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)βs particular pleading requirement without setting forth specific facts regarding at least one allegedly false or fraudulent claim submitted to the government.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Sep 21 2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2015) |
Oct 7 2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 4, 2015. |
Oct 21 2015 | Brief amici curiae of Coalition for Government Procurement, et al. filed. |
Oct 23 2015 | Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Associations filed. |
Oct 23 2015 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
Oct 23 2015 | Brief amicus curiae of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. |
Oct 23 2015 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed. |
Nov 4 2015 | Brief of respondent Todd Heath in opposition filed. |
Nov 23 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015. |
Nov 23 2015 | Reply of petitioners AT&T, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 20 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016. |
Jun 20 2016 | Supplemental brief of petitioners AT&T, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 27 2016 | Petition DENIED. |
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. Weβre still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
www.scotusblog.com
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _π©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ_ Register here β‘οΈ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. Heβs flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.