Arizona v. Bahr
Petition for certiorari denied on January 8, 2018
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in holding, in conflict with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, that the Environmental Protection Agency's interpretation of the Clean Air Act's contingency measures provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7502(c)(9), was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with the law.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Mar 07 2017 | Application (16A885) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2017 to May 10, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
Mar 10 2017 | Application (16A885) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2017. |
May 10 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2017) |
May 22 2017 | Waiver of right of respondents Sandra L. Bahr, et al. to respond filed. |
Jun 09 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 17, 2017. |
Jun 15 2017 | Brief amici curiae of South Coast Air Quality Management District, et al. filed. |
Jul 13 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 29, 2017. |
Aug 29 2017 | Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed. |
Sep 08 2017 | Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. |
Sep 13 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017. |
Sep 26 2017 | Response Requested. (Due October 26, 2017) |
Oct 12 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2017. |
Nov 30 2017 | Brief of respondents Sandra L. Bahr, et al. in opposition filed. |
Dec 18 2017 | Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. |
Dec 20 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018. |
Jan 08 2018 | Petition DENIED. |