Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license
agreement that covers multiple patents.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Jan 27 2022 | Application (21A377) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 8, 2022 to April 8, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
| Feb 01 2022 | Application (21A377) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 8, 2022. |
| Apr 01 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 5, 2022) |
| May 02 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated to respond filed. |
| May 03 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022. |
| May 10 2022 | Response Requested. (Due June 9, 2022) |
| May 16 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 9, 2022 to June 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 18 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 30, 2022. |
| Jun 30 2022 | Brief of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated in opposition filed. |
| Jul 20 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Oct 03 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
