|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-508||9th Cir.||Jan 13, 2021||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, by authorizing “injunction[s],” also authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to demand monetary relief such as restitution—and if so, the scope of the limits or requirements for such relief.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 03 2019||Application (19A252) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 18, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 03 2019||Application (19A252) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 18, 2019.|
|Oct 18 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2019)|
|Nov 13 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Cause of Action Institute filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Retail Federation filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 20, 2019 to December 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 21 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 20, 2019.|
|Dec 13 2019||Brief of respondent Federal Trade Commission filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Reply of petitioners AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 02 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 02 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|Jun 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.|
|Jun 23 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioners AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.|
|Jul 09 2020||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-825 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Jul 09 2020||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-508. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-508. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Aug 10 2020||Joint motion for alignment and extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Aug 11 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al. VIDED.|
|Aug 12 2020||Joint motion for alignment and an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits granted. Petitioners in No. 19-508 and respondents in No. 19-825 have to and including September 25, 2020, within which to file the joint appendix and their opening briefs on the merits. The Federal Trade Commission has to and including November 30, 2020, within which to file its consolidated response brief on the merits. VIDED.|
|Aug 20 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Federal Trade Commission|
|Sep 17 2020||Joint motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 25 2020||Brief of respondents Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al. filed (in 19-825).|
|Sep 25 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. VIDED|
|Sep 25 2020||Brief of petitioners AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. filed (in 19-508).|
|Oct 01 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of TechFreedom filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Surescripts, LLC filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of SBH A&I filed.(also in 19-825) VIDED.|
|Oct 05 2020||Joint motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by the parties GRANTED. VIDED.|
|Nov 09 2020||This case is no longer consolidated with No. 19-825, Federal Trade Commission v. Credit Bureau Center.|
|Nov 12 2020||Application (20A103) to file respondent's brief on the merits and petitioners' reply brief on the merits in excess of the word limits, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Nov 19 2020||Application (20A103) granted by Justice Kagan to file respondent's brief on the merits and petitioners' reply brief on the merits in excess of the word limits. Respondent's brief on the merits shall not exceed 15,500 words, and petitioners' reply brief on the merits shall not exceed 7,150 words.|
|Nov 25 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 13, 2021.|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief of respondent Federal Trade Commission filed.|
|Dec 03 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Former Federal Trade Commission Officials filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amici curiae of Remedies, Restitution, Antitrust, and Intellectual Property Law Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Open Markets Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amici curiae of States of Illinois, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Truth in Advertising, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 09 2020||The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 30 2020||Reply of petitioners AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 13 2021||Argued. For petitioners: Michael Pattillo, Fernandina Beach, Fla. For respondent: Joel R. Marcus, Washington, D. C.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.